Skip to content

TV is out, Web 2.0 is in

GIN, TELEVISION, AND COGNITIVE SURPLUS:
A Talk By Clay Shirky

[…] People asking, “Where do they find the time?” when they’re looking at things like Wikipedia don’t understand how tiny that entire project is, as a carve-out of the cognitive surplus that’s finally being dragged into what Tim O’Reilly calls an architecture of participation.

Now, the interesting thing about a surplus like that is that society doesn’t know what to do with it at first—hence the gin, hence the sitcoms. Because if people knew what to do with a surplus with reference to the existing social institutions, it wouldn’t be a surplus, would it? It’s precisely when no one has any idea how to deploy something that people have to start experimenting with it, in order for the surplus to get integrated, and the course of that integration can transform society.

Outstanding essay and video presentation. The movement of society from passive consumption to active participation that Shirky describes gives me hope for the future.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.