Skip to content

just a fit of pique

A Better World Is Not Possible

They may be right. But there’s something suspicious in any automatic answer. Set aside the need to say no, of course it was all very bad. We’re here anyway. Put down the sense that it is dangerous to ask—worse, that it is unserious, unadult, vaguely embarrassing to ask—for a moment. It’s just a little essay. It’ll be okay. Consider: Did the Weather Underground have a point? Then? Now? Were they a cautionary tale? If so, what is that tale about? Whither the caution? What, precisely, is the lesson here? Was it worth it?

Dangerous, Dirty, Violent, and Young: A Fugitive Family in the Revolutionary Underground

an eternal moment

Friedrich Engels once said: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty [Western] civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly, without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means.”

Rosa Luxemburg, The Junius Pamphlet

via the Facebook group for the Science Fiction podcast

2.8 days

Low-Earth orbit is just 2.8 days from disaster

Solar storms create a rapidly changing atmospheric environment that requires constant, real time monitoring and control. If that real time control is lost, the paper suggests there may be only a few days to restore it before the entire system collapses.

via /r/collapse

Games

According to [Johann] Huizinga [in Homo Ludens], games have certain common features. First, they are clearly bounded in time and space, and thereby framed off from ordinary life. There is a field, a board, a starting pistol, a finish line. Within that time/space, certain people are designated as players. There are also rules, which define precisely what those players can and cannot do. Finally, there is always some clear idea of the stakes, of what the players have to do to with the game. And, critically: that’s all there is. Any place, person, action, that falls outside that framework is extraneous; it doesn’t matter; it’s not part of the game. Another way to put this would be to say that games are pure rule-governed action.

It seems to me this is important, because this [is] precisely why games are fun. In almost any other aspect of human existence, all these things are ambiguous. Think of a family quarrel, or a workspace rivalry. Who is or is not a party to it, what’s fair, when it began and when it’s over, what it even means to say you won—it’s all extremely difficult to say. The hardest thing of all is to understand the rules. In almost any situation we find ourselves in, there are rules—even in casual conversation, there are tacit rules of who can speak in what order, pacing, tone, deference, appropriate and inappropriate topics, when you can smile, what sort of humor is allowable, what you should be doing with your eyes, and a million other things besides. These rules are rarely explicit, and usually there are many conflicting ones that could, possibly, be brought to bear at any given moment. So we are always doing the difficult work of negotiating between them, and trying to predict how others will do the same. Games allow us our only real experience of the situation where all this ambiguity is swept away. Everyone knows exactly what the rules are. And not only that, people actually do follow them. And by following them, it is even possible to win! This—along with the fact that unlike in real life, one has submitted oneself to the rules completely voluntarily—is the source of pleasure.

Games, then, are a kind of utopia of rules.

David Graeber, The Utopia of Rules
via Reddit

Homo Sacer

Epstein: A marxist perspective

Thus, the assumption that “the world is run by pedophiles” is mistaken because it confuses cause and effect. It is not pedophilia that makes one powerful, but power that generates those distorted forms of desire that express themselves in mistreatment and exploitation.

via reddit

Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life

Eigenvalue knows the score

Thomas Pynchon Is Angry

[…] one detects a writer who has finally lost patience with Americans’ persistent failure to understand the obvious consequences of their own country’s actions.

via Reddit

i read Gravity’s Rainbow last year. Pynchon’s relevance is so profound as to be deafening. i have V and Lot 49 on the shelves, i should read them too.

Why do people listen to this shit?

The Hatred of Podcasting

Shows like this have a flow that the listener doesn’t actually participate in—the hosts have gone home, you’re the only one in the room, and it’s a dead conversation that’s already happened—but, given the intimacy of how the product is consumed, can get the same psychic impression. On your commute, while you do laundry or cook dinner, your best friend lives in your phone.
[…]
The personalities here may seem ugly or garish, even repellent, to many reading this. The shows largely consist of stupid clichés spoken by repulsive people. They are often plainly thought destroying. That is precisely the reason for their popularity.

TrueAnon: Patreon, subreddit, NYT profile, GQ profile
Other favourites: Chapo, Trillbillies, Death is Just Around the Corner, Death // Sentence, Heat Death of the Universe, not Canadaland, not Red Scare

Go home, Tilly

Dear Tilly Norwood: Some Blunt Advice, Actress to “Actress,” From Betty Gilpin

Tilly, you can not look up and become half of someone. Because you are no one.

Scared

THE SPECTACLE MADE FLESH

What I want to talk about is about the reaction to the assassination. The hit did something I haven’t seen before. It spooked the political influencers. They are scared. Many of them spent last night issuing lengthy, serious statements on X about the gravity of the situation. Some of them are calling it a 9/11 event — a 9/11 for the influencer class.

the first example that i came across, earlier today (and i should add, a political opposite)

Another quote

I get high, I get fucked up … what the hell’s wrong with getting fucked up? There must be something wrong with the system if so many people have to get fucked up.

Ozzy Osbourne, interview in Sounds magazine, 1978
(via Adam Curtis, Shifty)